🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.