🔗 Share this article Moscow Demands Staggering Amount in Damages against Clearing House Regarding Frozen Assets Russia's monetary authority has stated it is seeking compensation totaling $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This action constitutes a clear response by the Kremlin against proposals to utilize frozen Russian state funds to support Ukraine. The Substantial Demand According to accounts in Russian state media, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand. European Union officials are set to determine later this week regarding a plan to use approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. This scheme involves granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its military and economic stability. The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main custodian for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves. Dispute on Ownership EU authorities have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU countries following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has warned of retaliatory measures, including confiscating EU private investors' holdings within Russia. The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a key position in peace negotiations, stated on X that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan. Strategic Positioning With statements seen as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a severe attack on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States." The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. It has previously noted it is facing over 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions. Legal Hurdles Ahead Although courts in European nations are unlikely to recognize rulings from Russian courts, analysts expect Moscow to seek implementation in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin. "Russian monetary authorities may attempt to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, if such holdings can be located," stated a lawyer from an international firm. EU Countermeasures European authorities indicated they are working on measures to deter other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against European entities. They are also designing protections to protect EU countries with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation." The Proposed Loan Mechanism Under the complex plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would stay untouched. Ukraine would solely be obligated to repay the loan if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense destruction caused during the nearly four-year conflict. Alternative Proposals The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the EU budget. This alternative move, nevertheless, requires unanimity among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition. Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful message that when you cause all this damage to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."